Why it matters
Reliable payers likely to keep raising dividends. Income screens are most useful when yield is paired with payout quality, balance-sheet strength and a dividend record that can survive weak markets.
Reliable payers likely to keep raising dividends.
“Aristocrat”-style stocks raise their dividend year after year. The screener payload does not carry dividend histories, so as a proxy this collection surfaces well-covered, highly profitable payers with a strong Reward rating — the profile of a reliable grower. Note: it approximates streaks rather than counting them.
Reliable payers likely to keep raising dividends. Income screens are most useful when yield is paired with payout quality, balance-sheet strength and a dividend record that can survive weak markets.
Compare yield with dividend cover, free cash flow, debt maturity and whether the payout is supported by recurring cash generation.
This is a proxy screen, so treat the result as a starting point. The highest yields often appear just before a dividend cut, so a big yield should be treated as a prompt for deeper work rather than comfort.
Showing the 40 largest of 866 — sort or filter to explore the rest.
Reliable payers likely to keep raising dividends. It currently holds 866 stocks, each rated by Openbook's Reward and Risk scores. “Aristocrat”-style stocks raise their dividend year after year.
Constituents are chosen by a rules-based screen over the full UK and US common-stock universe, then ranked by market capitalisation. This is a proxy screen — see the description above for the exact criteria and its limitations.
It is rebuilt from live market data, so the constituents and their rankings update as prices and company fundamentals change — there is no fixed, hand-edited list.
Openbook's Reward rating combines a stock's growth, momentum, profitability and valuation into a single 0–100 score, and the Risk rating scores financial strength, volatility and size. Use them to compare names within this theme — broadly, a higher Reward alongside a lower Risk is more attractive. They are quantitative research signals, not investment advice.
Openbook Reward and Risk ratings and factor scores are quantitative signals for research, not investment advice. Data may be delayed. Some US-listed names carry partial factor coverage.